CAMPUS LIFE Victor the beaver's guide to the interwebs

Top Errors You May Still Find in Today’s Textbooks

Jan 6 2013 at 11:15 am by

Textbooks have been the centerpiece of education for centuries now, and it is not all that uncommon for information to be updated and redacted throughout a textbook’s lifespan, through various new editions.

Some of these textbooks have such a long lifespan, it is impossible for them to remain objective and completely correct for decades, which makes finding errors today an easy task. It is particularly jarring when some of today’s textbooks get things offensively wrong.

We have listed some of these notable errors, examining errors ranging from incorrect math and grammar to offensive statements and even bigotry.

Keep in mind that some of these textbooks are still in use in classrooms, and the process for changing a textbook  can be quite long.  Ultimately, it is up to the school boards in the specific districts that still use them to change the curriculum.

To start, let’s look at a relatively minor infraction.  You’d think a history book’s author would be paying careful attention to chronology, but that’s not always the case. Take for example this passage from Pearson Literature’s The American Experience:

“… the Mayflower sailed into harbor at Plymouth, Massachusetts, in 1620.”

That’s a little confusing, considering Plymouth was founded by the people on the Mayflower, and certainly didn’t exist as a city beforehand.

 

 

 

Another historical inaccuracy that really should have been caught by the publishers at McDougal comes from The Americans: Reconstruction to the 21st Century.

“1492 Columbus first reaches North America.”

This would be a fine point for a timeline— if Columbus had ever made it to North America.

In reality, Columbus traveled in the Caribbean and to South America. The idea that Columbus “discovered America” has been making its way into common knowledge for a while now— and is totally false.

 

 

At least some of these other erroneous sentences made grammatical sense, unlike this passage from Joy of Statistics, a college textbook that costs $180:

“A random sample of 50 pieces of plastic are being used 6mm these pieces of nylon rope are taken and the breaking strength (KN) is measured.”

Plastic? Or rope? What’s 6mm? More importantly, who proofread this and how do they still have a job?

 


From there we can get even stranger. In a version of a common Texas biology book, Fearon’s Biology, it tells the story of Dr. Frankenstein— like it actually happened. No mention that this was a fictional story written by Mary Shelley, in 1818, when she was only 21.

“Frankenstein pieced together the parts of dead bodies. Finally, he brought a creature to life. But Frankenstein’s creation was an eight—foot monster. Eventually the monster destroyed the biologist.”

Poor Dr. Frankenstein. And poor students, coming out of a biology course believing that biologists spend time reanimating corpses.

The same biology book also makes the claim that it is impossible to walk through the rainforest in the Amazon:

“It is thick with trees, vines bushes, and other plants. You can’t even walk or even push your way through most of the rain forest.”

This is not even a little true— in fact, the heavy growth at the top of the rainforest often keeps plant life from taking over at the ground level.

 

While nonsense sentences in statistic books and anachronistic history texts are disturbing,  some of the textbooks published and used by thousands of American schools are flat out racist and offensive.  

This passage from America: Land I Love, published by A Beka Book curriculum, is especially worrying:

“God used the Trail of Tears to bring many Indians to Christ.”

In reality, the Trail of Tears is the name given to the forced march and relocation of thousands of Native Americans from the southeastern United States. Seminoles, Chocktaws, Creeks, Cherokees and other Native American tribes had their homes destroyed and were forced to march great distances and quartered in camps, treated terribly and subjected to exposure, disease and starvation. Thousands died. Of the 15,000 Cherokee, an estimated 4,000 perished as a direct result of the re—location. Unless “bring to Christ” is a euphemism for “bury”, it’s hard to understand what the textbook’s authors were trying to imply here.

 

While you might expect stuff like this from older textbooks, in this case from 1931’s The Lone Star State: A School History…

“When the ‘carpet baggers’ arrived, they deceived and pampered the negroes and soon had them loafing about the country in idleness, homeless and helpless. Southern farmers could not get them to stay at home and work.

This is wrong on so many levels, let’s move on.

 

 

…it’s much more alarming to find the same kind of racism in modern textbooks, like this nursing guide from 2012.  For instance, the Guide to Culturally Competent Healthcare seems to be anything but….

“ referring to African Americans as “high-keyed, animated, confrontational and interpersonal” and asserting that Japanese men are—culturally— “presumed not to be capable of managing day-to-day matters.”
When it comes to actual health matters, the textbook claims that in the African American community, being overweight is seen as a positive and implies that voodoo doctors are ubiquitous.
We recommend absolutely no one use this book as a guide to anything.

A textbook used in Virginia was the center of a scandal when a sentence in the history book claimed that “thousands” of African Americans fought in the Civil War— for the South. When the book’s author was questioned, she said she found the sources on the Internet. Not exactly where you want the people teaching your kids to be going for core information about major conflicts

 

In United States History for Christian Schools, things get even worse. The textbook reads:

“A few slaveholders were undeniably cruel. Examples of slaves beaten to death were not common, neither were they unknown. The majority of slaveholders treated their slaves well.”

Apparently the publishers at Bob Jones University think the only alternative to “beaten to death” is “treated well”. Downplaying the harsh reality of slavery is not only inaccurate, it’s unethical. But the University did just lift their ban interracial dating on campus in 2000.

 

Before you get back to your life feeling too depressed about humanity, here’s a funny non sequitur from American Government in Christian Perspective— published in 1997:

It is no wonder that Satan hates the family and has hurled his venom against it in the form of Communism.

You heard it here folks— Satan is destroying the American family, one venomous shot of Communism at a time.

 


The moral of this story? It’s a good idea to interact with kids and have discussions about the things they read, to spark interest in learning and reading.  

Teaching children to know right from wrong and to be able to spot errors is a great lesson to learn, even when—it comes from something written in their textbooks.

 

A Visual Guide to the Top 10 Worst Textbooks

Take a look at our Top Ten Worst Textbooks of all time to be aware of what could be lurking in your child’s curriculum.

Top Errors You May Still Find in Today's Textbooks

To embed this graphic, copy and paste below:
Top Errors You May Still Find in Today's Textbooks
via ValoreBooks.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Comments(8)

  1. This list is ridiculous – it is obviously written by someone predisposed to mock school textbooks. Some examples:

    - “the Mayflower sailed into harbor at Plymouth, MA”: While this could be worded better, it is a common conversational shorthand to say that colonists landed at [name of modern city]. The alternative is to say “The colonists landed in a place that had no name, but would be later named Plymouth” or “landed in a place called Patuxet by the Wampanoag.” While I would expect the greater accuracy in a textbook, I wouldn’t call it an error.

    - “Columbus reaches North America” – again, arguable to be a lazy convention that the islands of the Caribbean could be called part of North America. And once again – I would expect a textbook to take the opportunity to clarify where Columbus actually landed, I wouldn’t call it “wrong” the way you seem to with great glee.

    - “God used the Trail of Tears to bring many Indians to Christ.” I don’t know without more background, but is it possible the author used this phrase ironically? To wryly observe that many members of the tribal nations died in the name of manifest destiny, that’s the kind of thing I would say to contrast a deity’s goodness with the results of the forced march.

    But by far your worst transgression is the Frankenstein quote. I can’t tell without seeing the context, but I suspect it’s used as allegory or metaphor. If that’s the case, then are you suggesting that teenagers in a biology course need to be told that Frankenstein is fiction? Please.

    Honestly, I would suggest a rewrite. Instead of attacking textbooks as “wrong wrong wrong,” write with constructive criticism regarding lazy writing “landed at Plymouth” and advocating seizing opportunities to inform (“landed at the Wampanoag colony of Patuxet, which they renamed Plymouth and proceeded to settle…”

    (By the way, using books from Bob Jones University is shooting fish in a barrel)

  2. Love it! I found something kinda like this that made me laugh: http://bit.ly/WHpYmI

  3. If some one wishes expert view on the topic of running a blog afterward
    i suggest him/her to visit this web site, Keep up the nice work.

  4. Wow that was strange. I just wrote an extremely long comment but after I clicked submit my comment didn’t appear.

    Grrrr…well I’m not writing all thazt over again. Regardless, just wanted to sayy womderful blog!

  5. Good day! Do you know if they make any plugins to assist with
    Search Engine Optimization? I’m trying to get my blog to rank for some targeted keywords but I’m not seeing very good success.
    If you know of any please share. Appreciate it!

  6. Very nice write-up. I definitely love this website.
    Keep writing!

  7. Heya just wanted to give you a quick heads up and let you know a few of the images aren’t loading properly.
    I’m not sure why but I think its a linking issue. I’ve tried it in two different browsers and both
    show the same outcome.